Half Moon Plumbing was getting plenty of applicants. The problem was finding the good ones. WhoHire sorted 542 candidates down to the 5 worth talking to.
Half Moon Plumbing had no trouble attracting applicants. Their Indeed posts regularly pulled hundreds of responses. The problem? Maybe 2% were actually worth interviewing.
Screening 500+ applicants manually would take weeks — time the owner didn't have. So good candidates got lost in the pile while unqualified ones slipped through.
WhoHire's screening algorithms processed all 542 applicants in seconds. Each one got a R.E.G.I. score based on their responses and behavioral indicators.
529 were automatically filtered out — politely rejected with personalized messages. 13 were flagged for review. 5 made it to interviews.
Every applicant answered screening questions and received an instant R.E.G.I. score.
529 applicants rejected automatically based on role requirements and potential.
Owner only reviewed the 13 candidates most likely to succeed.
At 15 minutes per applicant review, Half Moon would have spent 135+ hours screening. Instead, they spent maybe 3 hours reviewing the top candidates.
All 5 hires are still with the company. Zero wasted interviews. Zero bad hires.
Hours returned to actually running the business
All 5 hires still employed and performing
"I used to dread checking my Indeed inbox. Now WhoHire just sends me the ones worth talking to."
— Owner, Half Moon Plumbing
542 applicants x 15 min each = 135 hours of screening.
WhoHire: 3 hours to review top candidates.
That's 132 hours saved. What would you do with an extra month of work time?
See how WhoHire can transform your hiring process.
Join these companies and discover what data-driven hiring
can do for your business.